Opposing Perspectives in Document Review
Plaintiffs and defendants face unique challenges during discovery. A central difference is asynchronous data; plaintiffs have had fewer data collection concerns while defendants have had to manage complex collection and production of vast ESI stores. On the other hand, defendants often have greater access to resources, while plaintiffs pay more attention to prioritizing expenses and making every dollar count towards a favorable outcome.
While both sides share a duty to competently review relevant case documents, goals and methodologies can differ distinctly. This webinar will cover how these different approaches can benefit from specialized document review strategies and technology.
- Is Discovery Different for Plaintiffs and Defendants?
- Asynchronous eDiscovery
- Differing Resources
- Contingency Arrangements
- Examining Plaintiff and Defendant Discovery Concerns
- Top Takeaways for Plaintiffs and Defendants
Opposing Perspectives in Document Review – PDF Download
About the Speaker
Gene Albert is the CEO of Lexbe, and a frequent speaker and writer on litigation technology and eDiscovery topics. He is on the Planning Committee of the Texas State Bar eDiscovery Program. Gene has his JD from Southern Methodist University and his MBA from the University of Texas at Austin.